EPS Versus XPS

The battle began, EPS versus XPS, and the test results are in. Expanded polystyrene (EPS) is the winner! This was clearly shown in an independent, third-party test. Expanded polystyrene maintains its R-value even after long-term exposure in northern climates. Extruded polystyrene (XPS) was shown to have lost R-value over time. In this 15 year side by side dual EPS outperforms XPS in both R-value retention and decreased water absorption. XPS insulation was reduced by half, while EPS boasts maintaining 94% of its specified R-value. Not only does XPS lose about half of its R-value, it also costs about 50% MORE than EPS. So why would anyone pay 50% more for 50% less? EPS is manufactured in large blocks, it is cut into sheets or virtually any special size and shape. XPS is a final form and does not have the size flexibility that EPS offers. The product performance, size flexibility, recyclability, and the lower price of our “white stuff” clearly makes EPS the champion.



For more information view EPS Outperforms XPS.

Have you seen the LITE? Click HERE to read more about the differences between EPS and XPS and what makes ICA-LITE® EPS the best choice.



Share on Facebook
Share on LinkedIn
Share on StumbleUpon


  1. canape cuir July 9, 2014 Reply

    It’s difficult to find well-informed people on this subject, but you seem like you know what you’re talking
    about! Thanks

  2. Tonia July 15, 2014 Reply

    Pretty! This was an incredibly wonderful post. Thanks for
    providing this info.

  3. sos serrurier July 17, 2014 Reply

    Great web site you have here.. It’s hard to find high-quality writing
    like yours these days. I truly appreciate people like you!
    Take care!!

    • ICA July 17, 2014 Reply

      Thank you very much! We appreciate your kind words and interest in our site!

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>